• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Mixed-Signal Design
  3. Switched Cap based System Noise Analysis

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 7
  • Subscribers 64
  • Views 18257
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Switched Cap based System Noise Analysis

Abhishek D
Abhishek D over 11 years ago

Hi,

      I am very new to noise analysis when it comes to switched capacitor based system. In my system I have a comparator which goes into unity  feedback mode with some frequency. I have also a capacitor which either connects from input of comparator and ground or input of comparator and input to be compared. Apart from that  I have some set of capacitors which gets connected or  disconnected to input of comparator and ground or input of comparator and some supply. 

 Apart from this, I have a bandgap charge which is being compared with input charge. I also have to look noise coming from there also. 

    I am interested to do noise analysis to this system. I have seen some thread,  but I couldn't understand how should I go about this circuit. I would be very thankful , if someone can help me doing this.

 

Best  Regards

Abhishek 

  • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 11 years ago

    Abhishek,

    PSS and PNoise are the answer here (most likely). You might want to take a look at Simulating switched-capacitor filters with SpectreRF.

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Abhishek D
    Abhishek D over 11 years ago

    Hi Andrew,

                         Thank you for being always first to answer. I referred your attachment before putting my query. But this says, it takes only  one clock. In my system multiple switchings are happening and that too at different rates. Pardon my ignorance if I am not able to understand the material you attached.

     

    Best Regards

    Abhishek 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 11 years ago

    Multiple switching (and different phases) are OK, but different frequencies might present a problem. What are the frequencies in your system?

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Abhishek D
    Abhishek D over 11 years ago

    Hi Andrew, 

                       Following are the details-

    1)  Comparator goes to unity feedback and then openloop -  222.22k

    2)  There are some caps and they either get connected b/w input of comparator and Supply or Input of comparator and ground- 2MHz

    3)  There is one switched cap BGREF. When comparator goes in unity feedback, there is charge in the capacitors due to bandgap. When compartor goes into openloop , input gets connected and input charge is compared to bandgap charge. Depending on the difference, the comparator switches. No such defined frequency but should finish operation in the open loop mode of comparator. 

     

    Best Regards

    Abhishek 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 11 years ago

    Hi Abhishek.

    If the frequency of the first clock has a period of 4.5us (so the period is 222.222222222k), then you could set that as your fundamental period in the PSS. Then the 0.5us period of the 2MHz clock would be exactly 1/9 of the other clock - and so you'd get a whole number of clock periods without too nasty a ratio and the simulation time should be reasonable.

    I am less sure about the third point because it is not clear whether this would have a periodic behaviour. If that switches within the period of the 222.2222kHz clock I think it should be OK. Hard to tell without understanding the circuit in more detail.

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Abhishek D
    Abhishek D over 11 years ago

    Hi Andrew,

                          Previously I gave some incorrect information. My flow is like that

    1) Comparator sampling bandgap charge @ 400 Khz

    2) Comparator sampling input charge @ 400 Khz but after 1. ( Phase lag )

    2) Caps are connecting disconnecting @ 2 Mhz

    timing  

    Best Regards

    Abhishek 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 11 years ago

    In that case your fundamental frequency is 400kHz (actually, reading your second point, if that's 1 cycle lag, you may need 200kHz to include two cycles of the clock to capture the fact that you need two cycles to capture the period behaviour).

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information