• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. RF Design
  3. bbspice fitting process taking too much time

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 7
  • Subscribers 63
  • Views 18253
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

bbspice fitting process taking too much time

anhchu88
anhchu88 over 4 years ago

Hi,

I have an S parameter file generated by EMX for my oscillator. It has 56 ports and was simulated from DC-900GHz with a 1GHz step. When I used bbspice as the interpolation method for the nport, the rational fitting takes almost 1 day and still has not finished. Could you suggest some techniques I could use to reduce the fitting time? Here I have kept the nport compression as default. I'm curious since Tawna mentioned in an earlier thread that she used to simulate an n-port with 405 ports (https://community.cadence.com/cadence_technology_forums/f/rf-design/37979/how-to-compare-what-spectre-interprets-from-the-raw-s-parameter-file/1352837#1352837).

I'm using Spectre Version 16.1.0.510.isr10 64bit -- 13 Oct 2017, Virtuoso IC6.1.7-64b.500.15, EMX 5.12, interface date 15/7/2020.

I include here the settings for my nport, and the screenshot from transient simulation showing the iterations of the fitting process.

Many thanks and regards,

Anh


  • Cancel
Parents
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 4 years ago

    Anh,

    I would suggest the following:

    1. Read the latest version of Tawna's 7 Habits of Highly Successful S-Parameters (Spectre 20.1, 19.1 and IC6.1.8 ISR9) guide
    2. Use SPECTRE20.1 not SPECTRE16.1 - there have been numerous improvements to the simulator and to bbspice (particularly in the latest versions) - so I'd strongly encourage you to check that
    3. This is covered in Tawna's guide, but  checking how smooth your s-parameters would be a good idea; a 1GHz step is pretty large...
    4. Contact customer support - this will be much easier to analyse and help with if we can actually see your data.

    Andrew

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 4 years ago

    Anh,

    I would suggest the following:

    1. Read the latest version of Tawna's 7 Habits of Highly Successful S-Parameters (Spectre 20.1, 19.1 and IC6.1.8 ISR9) guide
    2. Use SPECTRE20.1 not SPECTRE16.1 - there have been numerous improvements to the simulator and to bbspice (particularly in the latest versions) - so I'd strongly encourage you to check that
    3. This is covered in Tawna's guide, but  checking how smooth your s-parameters would be a good idea; a 1GHz step is pretty large...
    4. Contact customer support - this will be much easier to analyse and help with if we can actually see your data.

    Andrew

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information