• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Allegro X Capture CIS
  3. ORCAP-1589: Net has two or more aliases that might lead...

Stats

  • State Verified Answer
  • Replies 8
  • Subscribers 50
  • Views 19912
  • Members are here 0
More Content

ORCAP-1589: Net has two or more aliases that might lead to a short.

Fredda
Fredda over 3 years ago

Can't find anything useful about the ORCAP-1589 DRC warning so I'm asking here. I get this:

WARNING(ORCAP-1589): Net has two or more aliases that might lead to a short. Ensure nets are not shorted together or nets do not have two or more aliases. This message is displayed because 'Report all net names' is set in Design Rules Check dialog. U1,VCCO_PSDDR_504 VCCO_PSDDR_504 +1.1V

which is a total useless warning that I want to get rid of. I don't understand why in the first place Capture insists to use the name of the power pin of a part as an alias for the net. How can I change this or get rid of the Warning? By the way, disabling the "Report all net names" in the Design Rule Check Report Setup doesn't help, which the Warning message makes it look like.

/F

  • Cancel
  • Sign in to reply
Parents
  • yksv
    +1 yksv over 3 years ago

    This is a legacy from when Orcad was invented 40 years ago. The "standard" was a 5V supply called Vcc or Vdd, and a positive and negative higher voltage supply for analog stuff. Instead of wiring all the power pins on the schematic together, Orcad decided to connect them "behind the scenes" based on their names. This was an excellent strategy for at least 10 years. For the last 20 years at least this is a pain. It forces us to declare all power pins as passive to avoid this pseudo-error. I wish Cadence would add an option to disable this feature. I am not hopeful, the software people don't really know how the hardware people work, and it seems that Cadence has a very limited budget for improvements in Capture. They still need to figure out that there is credible competition, and when the schematic capture tool changes Allegro is also no longer used.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +4 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Reject Answer
    • Cancel
  • DB202504176312
    0 DB202504176312 1 month ago in reply to yksv

    Close but not quite.  Allegro had a powerful but awkward schematic capture tool called Concept.  One of the flexibilities was each part could have a lot of properties attached, because unlike Capture, Concept connected physical parts downstream just as going to the board layout, so these properties would help specify parts from a searchable database.  Capture forces the user to select a part up front.  Thus, in Concept if you needed to increase the power handling of a resistor, you modified that property and re-ran the search.

    In this case, Concept would let you have both a netname and label for each pin.  Capture narrowed it down to just a net name property now called "Pin Name"

    To have a different graphical label for a pin, create a new pin property specfy as "Label", set it equal to "VCC" which will now appear on the part alongside the Pin Name used by Capture.  You can them make the Pin Name, in my case, "V1V2" which is my power net hidden.  So you can leave the type as "Power" and all the checks run correctly, VCC appears in the graphic, and your power nets are confirmed.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
Reply
  • DB202504176312
    0 DB202504176312 1 month ago in reply to yksv

    Close but not quite.  Allegro had a powerful but awkward schematic capture tool called Concept.  One of the flexibilities was each part could have a lot of properties attached, because unlike Capture, Concept connected physical parts downstream just as going to the board layout, so these properties would help specify parts from a searchable database.  Capture forces the user to select a part up front.  Thus, in Concept if you needed to increase the power handling of a resistor, you modified that property and re-ran the search.

    In this case, Concept would let you have both a netname and label for each pin.  Capture narrowed it down to just a net name property now called "Pin Name"

    To have a different graphical label for a pin, create a new pin property specfy as "Label", set it equal to "VCC" which will now appear on the part alongside the Pin Name used by Capture.  You can them make the Pin Name, in my case, "V1V2" which is my power net hidden.  So you can leave the type as "Power" and all the checks run correctly, VCC appears in the graphic, and your power nets are confirmed.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
Children
No Data
Cadence Guidelines

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information