• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Allegro X PCB Editor
  3. Display Your Know How: Thermal Relief

Stats

  • Replies 16
  • Subscribers 162
  • Views 4871
  • Members are here 0
More Content

Display Your Know How: Thermal Relief

PCBTech
PCBTech 7 months ago

Can you think of any design methods to enable the removal of thermal reliefs, such as shown in the following scenario?

Thermal relief traces

 Thermal reliefs are widely used to improve assembly soldering. However, after soldering is complete these copper features generally do not favour the electrical or thermal performance of the circuit. So what if we could remove them?

Simply suggest any ideas how we could do this in the comments below. Any alternatives and opinions are welcome!

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel
Parents
  • excellon1
    excellon1 7 months ago

    Hi this is fairly easy to do within Orcad / Allegro. If using Allegro 17.2 and above you can change the pin properties so that the thermal relief is not needed, To do this select pins in the find filter then right click on the pin and choose property edit. Next assign the property of Dyn_Thermal_Con_Type and choose "none" for the layer you wish to remove the thermal from. Typically for thermal reliefs as in the picture there is a net associated with the pin so the net will still need to be connected on another layer.

    This only works for dynamic planes. If using Static planes there wont be dynamic thermals connecting to the pin.

    Best regards.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • PCBTech
    PCBTech 7 months ago in reply to excellon1

    Thanks for pointing this out excellon1 ! Yes it is easy to do manipulate the thermal relief property of pins in OrCAD and Allegro. But the question we would like to focus on is: should we?

    For electrical and thermal performance, the thermal type "Full_contact" is superior. This begs the question, why do we use thermal reliefs at all? Why not simply use full contact for shapes at all our pins?

    And what PCB design choices can we make to achieve this (if required) without compromising the automated assembly process; any suggestions?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • digital1
    digital1 6 months ago in reply to PCBTech

    We use thermal reliefs to make it easier for the guy that has to rework the pcb.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
Reply
  • digital1
    digital1 6 months ago in reply to PCBTech

    We use thermal reliefs to make it easier for the guy that has to rework the pcb.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
Children
  • PCBTech
    PCBTech 6 months ago in reply to digital1

    Hi digital1, your comment points exactly to the reason why thermal reliefs are required for pins. 

    We propose that thermal reliefs benefit soldering only; not electrical performance.

    The thermal benefit they bring to through-holes is to actually reduce thermal conductivity at each pin. Electrical current flow is also hindered by these narrow channels which can be important for high current circuits. 

    If anyone can think of benefits of thermal reliefs other than for assembly, please let us know?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • JCTEYSSIER0
    JCTEYSSIER0 6 months ago in reply to PCBTech

    Also for repair: is pin is full contact on all layer you have to heat up too much in order to remove solder and replace component: this can destroy the area.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • JCTEYSSIER0
    JCTEYSSIER0 6 months ago in reply to PCBTech

    A full contact on several layers brings to heat up too much pcb in order to remove/replace a component and bring to pcb destruction localy

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • PCBTech
    PCBTech 6 months ago in reply to JCTEYSSIER0

    HI JCTEYSSIER0, thank you also for your inputs! It seems that these reasons also relate to manufacturing performance more than electrical performance. Would you agree?

    An interesting point that you have brought to mind, is if any designers ever consider blocking heat from travelling into a pcb due to electrically generated thermal output of components. It is conceivable that heat could be channelled away from the pcb by way of direct contact with the surface of a component with a heat sink for example. In that scenario, perhaps we can imagine the requirement to reduce thermal transfer through the pcb for heat dissipation.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
Cadence Guidelines

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information