• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. PCB Design
  3. Allegro DRC issues once again

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4
  • Subscribers 164
  • Views 13490
  • Members are here 0
More Content
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Allegro DRC issues once again

archive
archive over 18 years ago

Hi all,

    And thanks in advance for any responses on this one as this is yet another strange emerging requirement in the high speed design world.  We have seen discontinuities on 100OHM diff pairs that has been root caused to the weave of the dielectric material.  The weave material has a different Dk than the epoxy, and one side of the pair may parallel the weave wile the other parallels the epoxy. We have seen Intel information that talks about this effect and both the Intel data sheet and the manufacturing vendor recommend that the design be rotated 10-15 degrees as the solution. I believe it is impractical to lay out the design like this so I decided to apply the rotation factor at manufacturing output time. This causes me 2 problems  one I don't like but can deal with is I have to maintain 2 databases at output for  2 reasons the assembler can't deal with the rotation on the data coming in i.e. pick and place fabmaster and ICT. The 2nd is ECO maintenance of the design going forward would be done on the orthogonal or non rotated version. The 2nd problem is disturbing to me and have not found a good way to fix yet. After rotating the design 11.25 degrees I have thousands of DRC's on a design that had none.  Even after turning off same net DRC I still had thousands. This is unacceptable. Does anyone have any experience with this? Maybe I need a different approach.  Passing it off to the vendor  to do though nullifies the IPC356 netlist test as none of points match from the CAD netlist to the vendor rotated artwork, so that is out golden board test does not work for us.
    I would also like to invite you all CDN Live in SanJose September 10-12th. I will be there hosting a table at the Networking luncheon on Monday and would like to meet you all. There are some excellent topics on the new features and usage models in the 16.0 release and one particular paper of interest to anyone involve in PLM integration is Cadence Allegro SPB Technology and Agile PLM Integration – A Case Study.

BTW Early registration ends August 26, 2007

www.cadence.com/.../index.aspx

Carl


Originally posted in cdnusers.org by CTMusetti
  • Cancel
Parents
  • archive
    archive over 18 years ago

    Front end can handle most of the roatation, I am told that the text is not done properly with Valor, I don't have Valor so can't verify this. Bottom line is if the vendor does they want to send the artwork back to us and us to approve it and be responsible for it, if this is the case I might as well do it myself and check myself but very difficullt to feel confident about the check when allegro's DRC goes wacko.  As far as I see it either the clearances were right orthoganal no matter what way I rotate it should be the same.  I have uncoupled diff pair that are off by 30 and 40 MILs now when the were exactly on before.


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by CTMusetti
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • archive
    archive over 18 years ago

    Front end can handle most of the roatation, I am told that the text is not done properly with Valor, I don't have Valor so can't verify this. Bottom line is if the vendor does they want to send the artwork back to us and us to approve it and be responsible for it, if this is the case I might as well do it myself and check myself but very difficullt to feel confident about the check when allegro's DRC goes wacko.  As far as I see it either the clearances were right orthoganal no matter what way I rotate it should be the same.  I have uncoupled diff pair that are off by 30 and 40 MILs now when the were exactly on before.


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by CTMusetti
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data
Cadence Guidelines

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information