• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. PCB Design
  3. Is angle routing recommended for XAUI??

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4
  • Subscribers 164
  • Views 13937
  • Members are here 0
More Content
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Is angle routing recommended for XAUI??

archive
archive over 17 years ago

Hai

   Is there any specific recommendation for XAUI rouitng. If so can anyone say what is the recommendation.


Jithu Tharoor


Originally posted in cdnusers.org by jithutharoor
  • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 17 years ago

    I've never dealt with XAUI, but I have used plenty of fibre channel and PCIe. These are pretty similar.

    1/ They're diff pairs. Look up the required differential impedance in the spec.
    2/ Look up the allowed intra lane skew.
    3/ Look up the lane to lane skew.

    That should give you a good basis for some simple constraints.

    Pay special attention to any point that gives an impedance discontinuity, layer changes, BGA breakouts and passives in your diffpair.

    Make sure your board is properly decoupled.

    If you're new to high speed signal integrity, I suggest a copy of "High Speed digital design (black magic)" and "High speed signal propagation (advanced balck magic)".

    If you're looking for someone to give you spacing rules, I doubt you'll get that here - tell your boss he needs to hire a SI engineer.

    Hope that helps.
    Mike V


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by vealmic@uk.ibm.com
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 17 years ago

    Thanks Mike,

    what I really want is , here we usually follow 45 degree routing.In some PHY specification it is said like XAUI needs ARC routing(Routing with small angles).I need to confirm like is that roting specific to that PHY or XAUI need ARC routing.


    Jithu Tharoor


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by jithutharoor
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 17 years ago

    Do you mean 45% champher on bends?

    Nobody can answer that question, there are too many other variables, like how long is your trace, how good is your impedance control, what are your geometeries within each pair? Even how many bends you're introducing.

    IF your impedance control is excellent, your traces very short, and you have little crosstalk in your nets, then you will have room for a bit of noise introduced by 45deg or 90 degree bends.


    Angled corners radiate more than curved ones (which means impedance discontinuities and SI issues too). There is also more skew introduced.

    Whether you can live with this or not is up to you. Lay it out, run a sim and see.
    If you're not sure, curvy traces are better for SI. Whilst it may tke you longer, you know that this particular aspect of layout can't be improved.

    I guess what I'm saying is do the SI work. If you don't have the resources, then you need to balance the cost to your schedule (to add rounded corners) with the risk of getting a card back with "issues". I know nothing about XAUI, will it autonegotiate to a lower speed? Is the card a development prototype, or will this ship to a customer?

    I don't think there are hard and fast rules. You need to decide based on your application.


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by vealmic@uk.ibm.com
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 17 years ago

    Check out the following paper on the subject:

    http://www.ultracad.com/articles/90deg.pdf

    I also attended a presentation by Dr.Hubing presenting the results sumamrized in the document which debunk many of the myths of route angles. UMR, Dr.Hubing, or Dr.Van Doren may have other published papers on the subject.


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by dschaefer
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Cadence Guidelines

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information