• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. PCB Design
  3. Is angle routing recommended for XAUI??

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4
  • Subscribers 164
  • Views 13939
  • Members are here 0
More Content
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Is angle routing recommended for XAUI??

archive
archive over 17 years ago

Hai

   Is there any specific recommendation for XAUI rouitng. If so can anyone say what is the recommendation.


Jithu Tharoor


Originally posted in cdnusers.org by jithutharoor
  • Cancel
Parents
  • archive
    archive over 17 years ago

    Do you mean 45% champher on bends?

    Nobody can answer that question, there are too many other variables, like how long is your trace, how good is your impedance control, what are your geometeries within each pair? Even how many bends you're introducing.

    IF your impedance control is excellent, your traces very short, and you have little crosstalk in your nets, then you will have room for a bit of noise introduced by 45deg or 90 degree bends.


    Angled corners radiate more than curved ones (which means impedance discontinuities and SI issues too). There is also more skew introduced.

    Whether you can live with this or not is up to you. Lay it out, run a sim and see.
    If you're not sure, curvy traces are better for SI. Whilst it may tke you longer, you know that this particular aspect of layout can't be improved.

    I guess what I'm saying is do the SI work. If you don't have the resources, then you need to balance the cost to your schedule (to add rounded corners) with the risk of getting a card back with "issues". I know nothing about XAUI, will it autonegotiate to a lower speed? Is the card a development prototype, or will this ship to a customer?

    I don't think there are hard and fast rules. You need to decide based on your application.


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by vealmic@uk.ibm.com
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • archive
    archive over 17 years ago

    Do you mean 45% champher on bends?

    Nobody can answer that question, there are too many other variables, like how long is your trace, how good is your impedance control, what are your geometeries within each pair? Even how many bends you're introducing.

    IF your impedance control is excellent, your traces very short, and you have little crosstalk in your nets, then you will have room for a bit of noise introduced by 45deg or 90 degree bends.


    Angled corners radiate more than curved ones (which means impedance discontinuities and SI issues too). There is also more skew introduced.

    Whether you can live with this or not is up to you. Lay it out, run a sim and see.
    If you're not sure, curvy traces are better for SI. Whilst it may tke you longer, you know that this particular aspect of layout can't be improved.

    I guess what I'm saying is do the SI work. If you don't have the resources, then you need to balance the cost to your schedule (to add rounded corners) with the risk of getting a card back with "issues". I know nothing about XAUI, will it autonegotiate to a lower speed? Is the card a development prototype, or will this ship to a customer?

    I don't think there are hard and fast rules. You need to decide based on your application.


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by vealmic@uk.ibm.com
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data
Cadence Guidelines

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information