Following Cadence Design Systems’ acquisition of the Design & Engineering (D&E) business, the D&E Community Forum on the Nexus Community Center has been migrated in the Cadence Physical System Simulation Community. For more details and if you have any questions, please refer to the FAQ.

Stats

  • State Not Answered
  • Replies 8
  • Subscribers 1
  • Views 9
  • Members are here 0
More Content

SPMM testrig and chassis templates with a Flex-body are generating an error.

burford.john
I've replaced the ges_chassis body with a flex-body and run the assembly on the SPMM testrig. This generates an error.
 
Reading in property files...
Reading of property files completed.
Setting up vehicle assembly for SPMM...
ERROR:  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
ERROR:  Error detected on line number 316, character 139 of the macro '.ACAR.macros.mac_ana_ful_spm_sub'.
ERROR:   "adams_id" is neither a field in nor a child of ""
ERROR:     (eval("control/routine=acarSDM::con952,function=user(952,"//.F98_spmm_01.testrig.cis_body_subsystem[2].cm.<<adams_id>>//",3,4,5)"))
ERROR:  The command was not executed.
ERROR:  +2&>           (eval("control/routine=acarSDM::con952,function=user(952,"//.F98_spmm_01.testrig.cis_body_subsystem[2].cm.adams_id//",3,4,5)")), &
ERROR:  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 
This error appears to be common to all chassis templates in acar_shared and acar_concept databases when run on the SPMM testrig with the ges_chassis part replaced with a Flex-body except for _flex_chassis.tpl.
 
Has anyone generated a procedure or script to apply the entities in _flex_chassis.tpl to a standard chassis template like _rigid_chassis_bof.tpl ?
 
Any suggests would be appreciated.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parents
  • 0
    i will check aero forces, what i was ​trying to say that after replacing rigid to flexible in rigid_chassis template the vehicle was able to run maneveurs, only spmm was not possible. after modification of communicator, spmm was also ok. My modification where pure in template level.
    ​
    Do you have knowledge why spmm needs one more communicator in case of flexible chassis and rigid chassis not?
Reply
  • 0
    i will check aero forces, what i was ​trying to say that after replacing rigid to flexible in rigid_chassis template the vehicle was able to run maneveurs, only spmm was not possible. after modification of communicator, spmm was also ok. My modification where pure in template level.
    ​
    Do you have knowledge why spmm needs one more communicator in case of flexible chassis and rigid chassis not?
Children
No Data
Cadence Guidelines

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.