• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Adams Car
  3. Getting 'Compliance matrix calculation failed' error on...

Following Cadence Design Systems’ acquisition of the Design & Engineering (D&E) business, the D&E Community Forum on the Nexus Community Center has been migrated in the Cadence Physical System Simulation Community. For more details and if you have any questions, please refer to the FAQ.

Stats

  • State Not Answered
  • Replies 1
  • Subscribers 1
  • Views 4
  • Members are here 0
More Content

Getting 'Compliance matrix calculation failed' error on SPMM testrig. Can someone please help me resolve this?

1ndeshmu
1ndeshmu over 6 years ago
I built a full-vehicle model making minor changes to the in-built macpherson strut template. The model runs fine on the SDI testrig but gives me the aforementioned error on SPMM testrig.
On SPMM, the SVC is simulated and then the Solver carries out 4-5 simulations before showing the compliance matrix error.
 
(1) I have compliance mode active for all the subsystems assembled in the full vehicle
(2) Hub compliance is active
(3) The characteristic array in suspension parameters is defined using geometric method using lower control arm outer point and top strut mount
 
I am attaching the .msg file for my failed SPMM test run.

Attached Files (1)
spmm_trial11_spmm.msg
  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel
Parents
  • 1ndeshmu
    0 1ndeshmu over 6 years ago
    After going through the .msg file, it occured that even after the compliance matrix calculation fails multiple times, iterations are carried out in subsequent time-steps. But then here is the actual error after which the simulation stops.
     
    ****** Performing Quasi-Static Simulation ******
     
     
    ---- START: ERROR ----
    Number of new element states 0 doesn't match number of old ones, 1.
    Simulation time is 1.000000000E+00
    Simulation time is 1.000000000E+00
    ---- END: ERROR ----
     
     
    Quasi Static Solution stopped.
    **************************************************
     
    On searching the internet for understanding what this error was, I found an article on SimCompanion that describes it, here's the link:
    https://simcompanion.mscsoftware.com/infocenter/index?page=content&id=KB8022931&actp=search&viewlocale=en_US&searchid=1590784017176
     
    Whoever gets this same error in the future maybe check this:
     
    The issue might be - redundant constraints in your model.
    Check for those in Tools > Model Diagnostics > Model Verify
     
    I had one joint in my model that added redundant constraints, replacing that joint solved the issue for me.
     
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
Reply
  • 1ndeshmu
    0 1ndeshmu over 6 years ago
    After going through the .msg file, it occured that even after the compliance matrix calculation fails multiple times, iterations are carried out in subsequent time-steps. But then here is the actual error after which the simulation stops.
     
    ****** Performing Quasi-Static Simulation ******
     
     
    ---- START: ERROR ----
    Number of new element states 0 doesn't match number of old ones, 1.
    Simulation time is 1.000000000E+00
    Simulation time is 1.000000000E+00
    ---- END: ERROR ----
     
     
    Quasi Static Solution stopped.
    **************************************************
     
    On searching the internet for understanding what this error was, I found an article on SimCompanion that describes it, here's the link:
    https://simcompanion.mscsoftware.com/infocenter/index?page=content&id=KB8022931&actp=search&viewlocale=en_US&searchid=1590784017176
     
    Whoever gets this same error in the future maybe check this:
     
    The issue might be - redundant constraints in your model.
    Check for those in Tools > Model Diagnostics > Model Verify
     
    I had one joint in my model that added redundant constraints, replacing that joint solved the issue for me.
     
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
Children
No Data
Cadence Guidelines

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2026 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information