• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Strange numbers in Virtuoso 6.1.5

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 14
  • Subscribers 126
  • Views 16988
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Strange numbers in Virtuoso 6.1.5

JulianJ
JulianJ over 13 years ago

 Hello,

I am seeing some strange number errors in Virtuoso 6.1.5.

In the ADE, I type  "1p" as the value for a variable and when set it appears as "1e122", "100f" becomes "1e155", "1f" becomes "1e155".

A similar error is also appearing on the drain diffusion area calculated on the FETs I am placing in my schematics, with the calculated area being displayed and netlisted as "480e155", when I think it should be "480f".

 I tried upgrading my instalation from  IC6.1.5-64b.500.1 to IC6.1.5-64b.500.9, but still have the same problem.

 Any help appreciated.

Julian

  • Cancel
Parents
  • itos
    itos over 10 years ago

    Thanks, Andrew!

    Alright, I changed to IC 6.16.080 (which is the next-highest version we have) and it indeed seems to works!

    I hope there won't be issues with the PDK or other things.

    OT: (I am cad novice) Are PDKs usually expected to run only with one particular version or more one version or above? (PDK just states requirements but it is not clear if the version need to be exact or not).

    Furthermore, how stringent need the other tools to fit IC? I used the closest match to what the PDK stated in the requirements (MMSIM 12.11.134, Calibre 2013.2, IUS 8.20.006). When I change now to IC 6.16.080, do I need to switch these tools as well?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • itos
    itos over 10 years ago

    Thanks, Andrew!

    Alright, I changed to IC 6.16.080 (which is the next-highest version we have) and it indeed seems to works!

    I hope there won't be issues with the PDK or other things.

    OT: (I am cad novice) Are PDKs usually expected to run only with one particular version or more one version or above? (PDK just states requirements but it is not clear if the version need to be exact or not).

    Furthermore, how stringent need the other tools to fit IC? I used the closest match to what the PDK stated in the requirements (MMSIM 12.11.134, Calibre 2013.2, IUS 8.20.006). When I change now to IC 6.16.080, do I need to switch these tools as well?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information