• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Howto read port currents when having multi-terminal bus...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 6
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 15580
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Howto read port currents when having multi-terminal bus ports in VerilogA ?

Herge
Herge over 13 years ago

Hello,

I am using multi-terminal ports in VerilogA, and would like to extract the current on one of the bus-lines using the construct I(<myport[thisline]>) where thisline is a genvar. As far as I understand the VerilogA reference manual and the Verilog-AMS specifications this should be possible, however the syntax checker (when saving the veriloga view in the library) does not allow this construct.

Am I doing something wrong ? 

**  Below the declaration of my modules and the ports :

 module qnrmesh2d(majport,minport);
   
   // Majority carriers terminals  
   inout [1:`QNRMESH2D_NPORTS] majport;
   electrical [1:`QNRMESH2D_NPORTS] majport;

   // Minority carriers terminals  
   inout [1:`QNRMESH2D_NPORTS] minport;
   electrical [1:`QNRMESH2D_NPORTS] minport;

** Example statement I would like to construct :

for (thisPort = 1; thisPort < `QNRMESH2D_NPORTS; thisPort = thisPort + 1) begin
    ...
    Enorm[thisPort] = I(<majport[thisPort]>)/(Area[thisPort]*Sigma_maj);


 ** But the syntax checker only allowed me to make the following (which I don't like because I did not want to create branches to ground) : 

for (thisPort = 1; thisPort < `QNRMESH2D_NPORTS; thisPort = thisPort + 1) begin
    ...
    Enorm[thisPort] = I(majport[thisPort])/(Area[thisPort]*Sigma_maj);
 
  • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 13 years ago

    This would have been much easier if you'd given a complete enough example to show the problem, and also which version of the simulator you're using. I used this:

    //
    i1 (n1 n2 n3 n4) qnrmesh2d
    ahdl_include "herge.va"
    dc dc

    and

    `include "disciplines.vams"

    `define QNRMESH2D_NPORTS 2
     module qnrmesh2d(majport,minport);

       // Majority carriers terminals
       inout [1:`QNRMESH2D_NPORTS] majport;
       electrical [1:`QNRMESH2D_NPORTS] majport;

       // Minority carriers terminals
       inout [1:`QNRMESH2D_NPORTS] minport;
       electrical [1:`QNRMESH2D_NPORTS] minport;

       real Enorm[1:`QNRMESH2D_NPORTS];
       real Area[1:`QNRMESH2D_NPORTS];

       real Sigma_maj;

    genvar thisPort;

    analog begin
        @(initial_step) Sigma_maj=1.0;
        for (thisPort = 1; thisPort < `QNRMESH2D_NPORTS; thisPort = thisPort + 1) begin
            Area[thisPort]=1.0;
            Enorm[thisPort] = I(majport[thisPort])/(Area[thisPort]*Sigma_maj);
        end
    end

    endmodule

    And this works fine - if I run "spectre herge.scs". I'm using  spectre version 11.1.0.366.isr7

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 13 years ago

    This also worked in  10.1.1.392.isr22

    Andrew,

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Herge
    Herge over 13 years ago

    Yes, Andrew, the construct I(majport[thisPort]) works fine. But this returns in fact I(majport[thisPort],0). I have multiple branches connected to node majport[thisPort], and I am afraid that I(majport[thisPort]) will not return the sum of all currents through the module port majport[thisPort] but only what flows through branch I(majport[thisPort],0).

    From my understanding of VerilogA, I was thinking I should use : I(<majport[thisPort]>)  -- which is the "(< . >)" port flow-access operator.

     Thanks. 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 13 years ago

    Herge,

    Sorry, I cleaned that up when I was messing with the code - I thought it was just you highlighting the relevant part and removed it on auto-pilot, forgetting that this means the current through the port.

    If you use the archaic syntax:

         //Enorm[thisPort] = I(<majport[thisPort]>)/(Area[thisPort]*Sigma_maj);
        Enorm[thisPort] = I(majport[thisPort],majport[thisPort])/(Area[thisPort]*Sigma_maj);

    Then it compiles (with a warning that you should use <> instead...).

    Please log this as a service request so that we can get this fixed. Hopefully you can use this as a workaround though.

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 13 years ago

    And when you log that service request, please reference this post on the forum to avoid the AE having to re-do the work... 

    Thanks,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Herge
    Herge over 13 years ago

    Created service request no 42907084.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information