• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Pnoise analysis

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 11
  • Subscribers 128
  • Views 18546
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Pnoise analysis

Jithin
Jithin over 12 years ago

Hi,

I have been designing a PLL which gives an output frequency in the range (400-500)MHz to the reference input frequency of (20-25)MHz.So for doing the pnoise analysis I have added the PSS as well as  Pnoise analysis

I have  made the following as setup for the analysis for a frequency of 500MHz. I have chosen 1) shooting method instead of harmonic balance 2)beat frequency to be the output of the divider (divider ratio is 20) that is 25MHz and also output of the PLL is selected as divider out in Pnoise tab. But it seems that the PSS is not converging and thus pnoise is failing.

So please direct me with the procedure for PSS as well as Pnoise for a PLL not for VCO alone.   

  • Cancel
Parents
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 12 years ago
    Hi Jothin,

    There was no file attached to view your analysis. However, I would suggest you consider breaking the analysis into several analyses - one for the VCO, phase detector, and divider if you do not want to resort to a macro model. Please consider the complexity of the simulation you are trying to perform. You are asking to find the steady-state transient solution of a system with local and global feedback whose components react in a high non-linear fashion. It is not surprising (to me anyway) that you are experiencing convergence issues with PSS.

    By examining the noise contributions of each component, not only will you greatly simply the analyses, but you will also gain insight into the relative noise contributions of each component and how they impact your final requirement. This will allow you to optimize those components that most impact your end requirement.

    Shawn
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 12 years ago
    Hi Jothin,

    There was no file attached to view your analysis. However, I would suggest you consider breaking the analysis into several analyses - one for the VCO, phase detector, and divider if you do not want to resort to a macro model. Please consider the complexity of the simulation you are trying to perform. You are asking to find the steady-state transient solution of a system with local and global feedback whose components react in a high non-linear fashion. It is not surprising (to me anyway) that you are experiencing convergence issues with PSS.

    By examining the noise contributions of each component, not only will you greatly simply the analyses, but you will also gain insight into the relative noise contributions of each component and how they impact your final requirement. This will allow you to optimize those components that most impact your end requirement.

    Shawn
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information