• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Is the device capacitance bias-dependent or independent...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 6
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 15315
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Is the device capacitance bias-dependent or independent?

Alex Liao
Alex Liao over 11 years ago
Hi, I would like to know if the device intrinsic capacitance like Cgs bias-dependent or independent. Giving say, bias 400mV or 500mV (common source circuit with Vgs = 400mV or 500mV) for 65nm technology, is the Cgs the same or different and why?

Thanks,
Alex
  • Cancel
Parents
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 11 years ago

     Hi Alex,

     >  I got the first paragraph.

    Great!

     

    >  By saying routing capacitance, are you saying interconnection Cap between devices or the interconnection Cap inside a device?

    I was not referring to the interconnect parasitics between devices as being the voltage invariant portion of device reactance. However,  I think you've got the concept. There are contacts and small amounts of metal that connect to the physical gate (2 um x 100 um area in your example) that are sometimes referred to as "local interconnect". These parasitics will not show a voltage dependency, but are important as they set the performance of the device. Some vendors PDK will add a set of discrete resistors or capacitors outside the BSIM model to include estimates of these in a pre-layout based netlist. When simulating using a post-layout netlist, the added "local interconnect" components are not requried as the parasitic elements associated with the local interconnect will be derived from the actual layout.

    I hope this makes sense Alex!

    Shawn

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 11 years ago

     Hi Alex,

     >  I got the first paragraph.

    Great!

     

    >  By saying routing capacitance, are you saying interconnection Cap between devices or the interconnection Cap inside a device?

    I was not referring to the interconnect parasitics between devices as being the voltage invariant portion of device reactance. However,  I think you've got the concept. There are contacts and small amounts of metal that connect to the physical gate (2 um x 100 um area in your example) that are sometimes referred to as "local interconnect". These parasitics will not show a voltage dependency, but are important as they set the performance of the device. Some vendors PDK will add a set of discrete resistors or capacitors outside the BSIM model to include estimates of these in a pre-layout based netlist. When simulating using a post-layout netlist, the added "local interconnect" components are not requried as the parasitic elements associated with the local interconnect will be derived from the actual layout.

    I hope this makes sense Alex!

    Shawn

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information