• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Usage of (* cds_inherited_parameter *)

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 13793
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Usage of (* cds_inherited_parameter *)

chenchen
chenchen over 10 years ago

Hi all,

I try the simple case in Verilog-A document and I want to obtain "different" values of mismatch parameter in single Verilog-A module.

// I want to use "single" random variable for different parameters w/ mismatch

// variation.scs

section my_variation

parameters monteres=0

statistics {

  mismatch {
    vary monteres dist=gauss std=5
  }
}

endsection my_variation

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

// pseudo code 

include "variation.scs"  my_variation

(* cds_inherited_parameter *) parameter real monteres = 0;
parameter real r = 1k;

localparam real r1_effective = r + monteres; 

localparam real r2_effective = r + monteres; 

V(vp1, vn1) <+ (r1_effective)*I(vp1, vn1);

V(vp2, vn2) <+ (r2_effective)*I(vp2, vn2);

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

I expect two different random values of r1_effective and r2_effective, but I just got one random value during each Monte Carlo iteration ( r1_effective=r2_effective)

Anyone knows what is correct usage for such cases? (I want r1_effective != r2_effective)

Many thanks.

  • Cancel
Parents
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 10 years ago

    Having lots of instances of the Verilog-A is almost certainly less efficient than having a single instance with many parameters. The only problem with having a huge number of mismatch parameters is that these need to be generated for every instance in the design (not just the instances that use them), so that's also expensive. However, given the fact that the random numbers are generated for each mismatch parameter and for each instance, there's no getting around this fact...

    Maybe you should contact customer support so that we can talk in more detail about your unusual requirements.

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 10 years ago

    Having lots of instances of the Verilog-A is almost certainly less efficient than having a single instance with many parameters. The only problem with having a huge number of mismatch parameters is that these need to be generated for every instance in the design (not just the instances that use them), so that's also expensive. However, given the fact that the random numbers are generated for each mismatch parameter and for each instance, there's no getting around this fact...

    Maybe you should contact customer support so that we can talk in more detail about your unusual requirements.

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information