• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Regarding monte carlo simulations

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 7
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 19507
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Regarding monte carlo simulations

ag2888
ag2888 over 9 years ago

Hi,

I am trying to run monte carlo simulations for my design and see the following trends in it.

The results vary if i add in a circuit which is not connected to the circuit for which the result is being considered.

The results vary even if i add in dummy devices, resistors etc.

If i manually choose the added devices to be ignored, only then the result remains the same.

Is this expected for the monte carlo sims?  

  • Cancel
Parents
  • ag2888
    ag2888 over 9 years ago

    Yes i meant the results are different when the additional devices are added in.

    But isn't this incorrect as this would mean we would have different results at every hierarchy. Then which result should we be considering? Also then at the top level even unrelated blocks will affect the results for every block?

    As an example, i saw the below results for the tests that i ran on 2 unrelated res divider circuits-

    Res div A and res div B have no connection to each other at all except they share the same ground.

    Initial MC run results (1 sigma) were : A output=1.39mV & B output=532uV

    But when I add 20 pieces of dummy resistors on res div B,1 sigma results were: A output=1.29mV & B output=2.74mV 


    Also wanted to clarify one thing, what exactly do you mean by - the results are still within the distribution of the parameters?

    Does it mean that results are still valid results as the random values for device parameters are chosen from the defined distribution data for the same? 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • ag2888
    ag2888 over 9 years ago

    Yes i meant the results are different when the additional devices are added in.

    But isn't this incorrect as this would mean we would have different results at every hierarchy. Then which result should we be considering? Also then at the top level even unrelated blocks will affect the results for every block?

    As an example, i saw the below results for the tests that i ran on 2 unrelated res divider circuits-

    Res div A and res div B have no connection to each other at all except they share the same ground.

    Initial MC run results (1 sigma) were : A output=1.39mV & B output=532uV

    But when I add 20 pieces of dummy resistors on res div B,1 sigma results were: A output=1.29mV & B output=2.74mV 


    Also wanted to clarify one thing, what exactly do you mean by - the results are still within the distribution of the parameters?

    Does it mean that results are still valid results as the random values for device parameters are chosen from the defined distribution data for the same? 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information