• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Regarding Simulation time in nc-verilog and in ADE-L/XL...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2
  • Subscribers 126
  • Views 1121
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Regarding Simulation time in nc-verilog and in ADE-L/XL + AMS

RFStuff
RFStuff over 6 years ago

Dear All,

I have a test-bench  (event based only) have the blocks written in verilog and VHDL.

I want to have the test-bench as schematic view. So I have drawn the test-bench in Schematic-Composer.

So, I can run it only through ADE-L + ams.

I want to know whether this way will have same simulation time as that of the run done by using nc-verilog commands in the terminal.

Can anybody please answer my query ?

Kind Regards,

  • Cancel
Parents
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 6 years ago

    The performance of running via ADE is the same as running from the command line (using irun/xrun typically). If you have no analog nodes in the circuit, you'll see in the log file that the spectre solver is started. If there's no analog (no electrical nodes for example), the log file won't show the analog solver is started, and so the speed should essentially be the same as a standalone command-line digital simulation. There is a chance that the elaboration takes a different amount of time if you're comparing against ncverilog (since the flow is slightly different with ncverilog compared with xrun, but the simulation run time itself I would expect to be similar).

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 6 years ago

    The performance of running via ADE is the same as running from the command line (using irun/xrun typically). If you have no analog nodes in the circuit, you'll see in the log file that the spectre solver is started. If there's no analog (no electrical nodes for example), the log file won't show the analog solver is started, and so the speed should essentially be the same as a standalone command-line digital simulation. There is a chance that the elaboration takes a different amount of time if you're comparing against ncverilog (since the flow is slightly different with ncverilog compared with xrun, but the simulation run time itself I would expect to be similar).

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information