• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Using the same output expressions for post-layout simul...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 9174
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Using the same output expressions for post-layout simulation

delgsy
delgsy over 3 years ago

Previously, I worked on smaller circuits and never had any need to probe inner nodes, just characterized the circuit performance from the output pins.
Now, I want to probe inner nodes and use the same output expressions for post-layout simulation.
I almost always use "expr" type for the outputs.
From here[1] and here[2], it seems that I need to create .simrc file.
But still cannot make it works.


In order to be sure, now I am doing Lab3 section from here[2], it shows that outputs with type "signal" and "expr" work well.


But that is not the case when I try it. I cannot make output with the type "expr" works.
This is actually my original problem.


Modification of .simrc for "signal" type of outputs is explained in here[1],  but not the ones with "expr" type.
did I miss anything here?

Again, my main target is using the same output expressions both for pre- and post-layout simulation.
If there is another way to achieve this other than what has been explained in here[1] and here[2],I would like to be informed.

  • Cancel
Parents
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 3 years ago

    Please contact customer support for this. There are some newer flows which aim to make this simpler without needing .simrc modifications.

    Andrew

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 3 years ago

    Please contact customer support for this. There are some newer flows which aim to make this simpler without needing .simrc modifications.

    Andrew

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
  • delgsy
    delgsy over 3 years ago in reply to Andrew Beckett

    Hi Andrew,
    Thank you for your quick reply.
    I do not have access to contact the customer support.
    If there has been documentation for this new flow, I would like to know.
    Thanks again.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 3 years ago in reply to delgsy

    If you're at an academic institution, then if you have access through Europractice, ask them for support. Otherwise you can get your University program owner to log a case on your behalf.

    The challenge is that I'm not sure the new flow is widely available yet, so I don't think there's public documentation or a rapid-adoption kit on it. I have a quick start guide, but it's not something I can share here.

    So maybe I'm premature in suggesting the new flow.

    Andrew

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information