• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. input-referred noise measurement issue

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 6612
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

input-referred noise measurement issue

engmsalik321
engmsalik321 over 1 year ago

I’m facing an issue with the input-referred noise in a circuit I’m simulating in Cadence Virtuoso Spectre (maestro). The input noise I’m getting is significantly different from what I expected.

To elaborate, according to Chapter 4 of Dr. Behzad’s book, the output and input-referred noise of a resistance-based Transimpedance Amplifier (TIA) should be as follows:


However, when I simulate this circuit in Cadence and perform the noise analysis, I get the following results:

Interestingly, the output noise from the simulation aligns approximately with the formula. However, the input noise is completely different.

I’m unsure why this discrepancy exists and would appreciate any insights or suggestions.  I am calculating the total noise by integrating the I**2/Hz and V**2/Hz curves, as shown below. ( A form also discusses this method of noise measurement in cadence.)  


Thank you in advance for your help!

Update:  I have figured out from a circuit that the input noise is constant throughout the whole frequency band and is the thermal noise of the resistor, which is equal to 4kTR. (Where T=300k)
However, my method of integrating the input-noise is wrong. The integration method works for the output-referred noise because the output-noise curve decays and does not explode.  What will be the right way to find the input-referred noise?

Update2:
I tried to find the input-referred noise by dividing the Output Refereed Noise by the Gain, as shown below.

Now, I get the value of 346.8p, which is still not equal to the value given by the formula. What is the thing that I am missing?

  • Cancel
  • engmsalik321
    engmsalik321 over 1 year ago

    I’m facing an issue with the input-referred noise in a circuit I’m simulating in Cadence Virtuoso Spectre (maestro). The input noise I’m getting is significantly different from what I expected.

    To elaborate, according to Chapter 4 of Dr. Behzad’s book, the output and input-referred noise of a resistance-based Transimpedance Amplifier (TIA) should be as follows:


    However, when I simulate this circuit in Cadence and perform the noise analysis, I get the following results:

    Interestingly, the output noise from the simulation aligns approximately with the formula. However, the input noise is completely different.

    I’m unsure why this discrepancy exists and would appreciate any insights or suggestions.  I am calculating the total noise by integrating the I**2/Hz and V**2/Hz curves, as shown below. ( A form also discusses this method of noise measurement in cadence.)  


    Thank you in advance for your help!



    Update:  I have figured out from a the circuit that the input noise is constant throughout the whole frequency band and is the thermal noise of the resistor which is equal to 4kTR. (Where T=300k)
    However my method of integrating the input-noise is wrong. The integration method works for the output-referred noise because the output-noise curve decays and does not explode.  What will be right way to find the input referred noise?

    Update2:
    I tried to find the input referred noise by dividing the Output Refereed Noise by the Gain as shown below.

    Now, I get the value of 346.8p, which is still not equal to the value given by the formula. What is the thing that I am missing?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 1 year ago in reply to engmsalik321

    Please do not post the same question in more than one forum - see the Guidelines for the Custom IC Design Forum.

    I was hoping to answer this (maybe somebody else will) but I haven't had time due to other commitments. However, posting the question multiple times just annoys people and won't necessarily get it answered any quicker.

    Andrew

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • engmsalik321
    engmsalik321 over 1 year ago in reply to Andrew Beckett

    Sorry for the trouble. Should I delete this, or it will automatically be deleted? 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 1 year ago in reply to engmsalik321
    engmsalik321 said:
    Sorry for the trouble. Should I delete this, or it will automatically be deleted? 

    No need; I merged the two threads.

    Andrew

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information