• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Digital Implementation
  3. Peak and average IR drop analysis mode

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 8
  • Subscribers 90
  • Views 19817
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Peak and average IR drop analysis mode

archive
archive over 18 years ago

Hello,

I am not sure about what means peak and average IR drop mode analysis in Encounter. What of these two analysis modes should be considered for power plan optimization?

I have a small block design (5K gates) operating at very low frequency (640 KHz) and there is a big difference between the results of these two analysis modes:

  • worst IR drop average analysis: 9.8035e-05 v

  • worst IR drop peak analysis: 4.3088e-01 v

Is average analysis frequency dependent? But voltage drop is not event dependent and so can cause timing problems also at low frequencies?

Thanks in advance.

 


Originally posted in cdnusers.org by clsantos
  • Cancel
Parents
  • archive
    archive over 18 years ago

    Hello,

    Considering your answers and information found in this article (http://www.soccentral.com/results.asp?CategoryID=488&EntryID=19453)
    I think these different analysis modes should be used for:
    Optimize power rings/stripes: Average/static analysis;
    Insert DECAP cells or avoid that all logic switch at the same time: Peak/dynamic analysis.

    However, concerning elvis' answer, if FE's peak IR drop analysis does not consider C effect thus the natural decoupling capacitance of power network is not considered. Besides that, this analysis will not take into account inserted DECAP cells. Are these assumptions correct?
    So, what is the purpose of this FE's peak analysis?


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by clsantos
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • archive
    archive over 18 years ago

    Hello,

    Considering your answers and information found in this article (http://www.soccentral.com/results.asp?CategoryID=488&EntryID=19453)
    I think these different analysis modes should be used for:
    Optimize power rings/stripes: Average/static analysis;
    Insert DECAP cells or avoid that all logic switch at the same time: Peak/dynamic analysis.

    However, concerning elvis' answer, if FE's peak IR drop analysis does not consider C effect thus the natural decoupling capacitance of power network is not considered. Besides that, this analysis will not take into account inserted DECAP cells. Are these assumptions correct?
    So, what is the purpose of this FE's peak analysis?


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by clsantos
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information