• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Digital Implementation
  3. Why there is a difference in Optimisation when we change...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4
  • Subscribers 93
  • Views 13845
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Why there is a difference in Optimisation when we change clock period directly instead of changing the uncertainty?

NAADHAN
NAADHAN over 16 years ago

Hi ,

 In our project we have a single clock....Here we run mutiple placement runs by targetting higher frequencies. This can be done in two ways          1.By changing the uncertainty each time keeping the clock period constant.
                  2.By Changing the clock period each time keeping the uncertainty constant.

Here in the both the approach when we target for the same frequency(Eg: 1)Period:2ns & uncertainty:100ps 2)Period:1.9ns& uncertainty:0ps) ....we get entirely different results.....

 So can anyOne Pls explain me how does the tool undertands the  change in uncertainity and change in time period..????

Thanks & Regards,
Naadhan

  • Cancel
Parents
  • geleshan
    geleshan over 16 years ago

    The 1)Period:2ns & uncertainty:100ps 2)Period:1.9ns& uncertainty:0ps are quite different during "hold" timing check.

    When calculate "hold" timing: 

    For case (1).  the capture clock pin "see" the period 2.1ns (2.0 original period plus 0.1 uncertainty)

    For case (2). the capture clock pin "see" the period 1.9ns. (1.9 original period plus 0.0 uncertainty).

    So, your case (1) result may have much more buffer added to avoid hold violations.

     Gele

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • geleshan
    geleshan over 16 years ago

    The 1)Period:2ns & uncertainty:100ps 2)Period:1.9ns& uncertainty:0ps are quite different during "hold" timing check.

    When calculate "hold" timing: 

    For case (1).  the capture clock pin "see" the period 2.1ns (2.0 original period plus 0.1 uncertainty)

    For case (2). the capture clock pin "see" the period 1.9ns. (1.9 original period plus 0.0 uncertainty).

    So, your case (1) result may have much more buffer added to avoid hold violations.

     Gele

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information