• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Digital Implementation
  3. help ! about CTS insertion delay

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3
  • Subscribers 91
  • Views 14724
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

help ! about CTS insertion delay

icmaple
icmaple over 15 years ago

in my case, there is a clkgen module, which has many divider-clock generator. i specify AutoCTSRootPin at chip port, and when i do cts, encounter total insert about 10 ns delay upto Sinks , but Only in clkgen module ,there is 7ns delay .( 70% occupied)  

what reason can cause the issue?  thanks 

  • Cancel
Parents
  • BobD
    BobD over 15 years ago

    I'm not sure I understand your question.  Are you saying that CTS is creating a tree with insertion delay that is too large (10ns when you'd like it to be more like 2ns?) and further a large percentage of the insertion delay is within one logical hierarchy?

    If so, you might want to have a look to see if there are instances/nets that are in the clkgen module that are marked dont_touch (or the instances are from cell masters marked dont_use/dont_touch in the .lib).  Perhaps CTS is unable to reduce delay within this module because it's being restricted by these markings.

    If this is off the mark, try re-phrasing the question.  Someone may be able to help if they understand better.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • BobD
    BobD over 15 years ago

    I'm not sure I understand your question.  Are you saying that CTS is creating a tree with insertion delay that is too large (10ns when you'd like it to be more like 2ns?) and further a large percentage of the insertion delay is within one logical hierarchy?

    If so, you might want to have a look to see if there are instances/nets that are in the clkgen module that are marked dont_touch (or the instances are from cell masters marked dont_use/dont_touch in the .lib).  Perhaps CTS is unable to reduce delay within this module because it's being restricted by these markings.

    If this is off the mark, try re-phrasing the question.  Someone may be able to help if they understand better.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information