Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 8
  • Subscribers 93
  • Views 17220
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Encounter 8.1 vs 9.1 sdf generation

MzQuarter

Hi,

I've used Encounter 8.1 for past projects to generate sdf back-annotation for simulation and it worked great. Now we've moved to Encounter 9.1, but the exact same 8.1 encounter project reloaded in 9.1 gives different results. First of all, the middle field ("typical", my guess) is no longer present, and when I load the sdf in a simulator the delays are all taken as 0 (no delays).  Second, the delays for interconnect are different, and quite often 0. Another difference I noticed is that in 8.1 the value triplets were always the same (which I thought odd), but not in encounter 9.1.

What am I missing? I'm almost sure it's just a setting, but I can't see where or how.

Thanks.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Encounter 8.1:

(INTERCONNECT I_NCS U134/A (0.0037:0.0037:0.0037) (0.0037:0.0037:0.0037))
(INTERCONNECT I_SCLK Q_TRANSACTIONCOMPLETE_REG/CKN (0.0045:0.0045:0.0045) (0.0045:0.0045:0.0045))

Encounter 9.1:

(INTERCONNECT I_NCS U134/A  (0.003::0.004) (0.003::0.004))
(INTERCONNECT I_SCLK Q_TRANSACTIONCOMPLETE_REG/CKN  (0.000::0.000) (0.000::0.000))

Parents
  • diablo

    If i understood correctly, you want to do mixed signal timing simulation with parasitic delay included. When you do extraction of your top level to generate SPEF, you could generate spef_typical, spef_best, spef_wst for different corners. Then before writing out sdf, you could just use  "set_analysis_view -setup best -hold best","spefIn spef_best'(look in cmd ref for full syntax), and then write_sdf . This will give sdf with interconnect delay for you best corner. Do the same thing for all 3 corners with corresponding spef and view. Then finally you have to combine all the sdf using "sdfCombine" to generate single sdf file with all three corners delay values populated.

    This may not be the most efficient way to do it. I will let other forum users to comment on the ways they are generating sdf.

Reply
  • diablo

    If i understood correctly, you want to do mixed signal timing simulation with parasitic delay included. When you do extraction of your top level to generate SPEF, you could generate spef_typical, spef_best, spef_wst for different corners. Then before writing out sdf, you could just use  "set_analysis_view -setup best -hold best","spefIn spef_best'(look in cmd ref for full syntax), and then write_sdf . This will give sdf with interconnect delay for you best corner. Do the same thing for all 3 corners with corresponding spef and view. Then finally you have to combine all the sdf using "sdfCombine" to generate single sdf file with all three corners delay values populated.

    This may not be the most efficient way to do it. I will let other forum users to comment on the ways they are generating sdf.

Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.