• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Digital Implementation
  3. Move Clock Tree buffers after Integrated clock gate cell...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1
  • Subscribers 92
  • Views 14301
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Move Clock Tree buffers after Integrated clock gate cell in clock tree

deepu
deepu over 12 years ago
I have inserted integrated clock gate cells in my design in DC and during clock tree synthesis, Encounter inserts the CLK buffers before the clock gate. This causes the buffer to run, when there is no clock required. ANyone know how to move the clock buffers after the clock gate cells, so that they switch only when the circuit needs clock and save power. I am using SoC Encounter.

  • Cancel
Parents
  • fitz
    fitz over 12 years ago
    If the integrated clock gating (ICG) cell is capable of directly driving all it's leaf cells without any max cap, tran or fanout violations, normally you would not save any power by moving the ICG tap off point further up the clock tree.

    Think of it this way, if the main clock was going to be routed there anyway what power are you going to save by routing two separate clocks to cover the same area?

    It is a different story if you have multiple "equivalent" ICG cells that can be merged with ckDecloneGate, you "may" save power by tree distributing the gated clock separately if it is going to a relatively isolated / concentrated area.

    One of my current blocks has 32 unique ICG cells, BUT all the leaf cells are all intermixed , there is no way I could possibly CTS 32 essentially parallel clocks, I had to clone and push the ICG cells to the very bottom (leaf driver) of the tree with ckCloneGate.
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • fitz
    fitz over 12 years ago
    If the integrated clock gating (ICG) cell is capable of directly driving all it's leaf cells without any max cap, tran or fanout violations, normally you would not save any power by moving the ICG tap off point further up the clock tree.

    Think of it this way, if the main clock was going to be routed there anyway what power are you going to save by routing two separate clocks to cover the same area?

    It is a different story if you have multiple "equivalent" ICG cells that can be merged with ckDecloneGate, you "may" save power by tree distributing the gated clock separately if it is going to a relatively isolated / concentrated area.

    One of my current blocks has 32 unique ICG cells, BUT all the leaf cells are all intermixed , there is no way I could possibly CTS 32 essentially parallel clocks, I had to clone and push the ICG cells to the very bottom (leaf driver) of the tree with ckCloneGate.
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information