• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Functional Verification
  3. Doe's this 'dist' constraint is legal?

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3
  • Subscribers 65
  • Views 1037
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Doe's this 'dist' constraint is legal?

Main
Main over 16 years ago

Hello,

 I tried to use the following constraint (dist) which I'm not sure is syntatically legal.
Anyway, the NC simulator compiled it without warnings but it didn't work as expected in simulation:

cmd_kind dist { {CFG_WR, PGM_WORD, PGM_PAGE, READ_PAGE, READ_WORD} := 10, SW_RESET := 1};

In simulation I got only SW_RESET cmd kind.

The alternative is to explictly define weight for each item of the {} group which is really not comfortable.

Does anyone know if by SV LRM this should have worked?

Thanks,

 

  • Cancel
  • StephenH
    StephenH over 16 years ago

    I think you wanted to use square brackets instead of curly ones, around the range:

    cmd_kind dist { [CFG_WR, PGM_WORD, PGM_PAGE, READ_PAGE, READ_WORD] := 10, SW_RESET := 1};

    And I'm assuming you had this inside a constraint block or "randomize() with" construct...

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Main
    Main over 16 years ago
    Hey StephenH, Are sure the syntax you suggested is legal? I tried that already before and the Compiler was expecting ':' meaning [a:b] and not a list. 
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • StephenH
    StephenH over 16 years ago

    Yes, sorry, I misread your original question.

    The LRM doesn't showany examples of what you're trying to do. The ranges are always contiguous, as in:

    x dist { [100:102] := 1, 200 := 2, 300 := 5}

    Also, the formal syntax suggests that the range must be in the form [a:b] and not a list of non-consecutive numbers, so I guess what you wanted to do is not legal according to the LRM.

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information