Stats

Locked Locked
Replies 3
Subscribers 65
Views 1038
Members are here 0

This discussion has been locked.

You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Doe's this 'dist' constraint is legal?

Hello,

I tried to use the following constraint (dist) which I'm not sure is syntatically legal.
Anyway, the NC simulator compiled it without warnings but it didn't work as expected in simulation:

cmd_kind dist { {CFG_WR, PGM_WORD, PGM_PAGE, READ_PAGE, READ_WORD} := 10, SW_RESET := 1};

In simulation I got only SW_RESET cmd kind.

The alternative is to explictly define weight for each item of the {} group which is really not comfortable.

Does anyone know if by SV LRM this should have worked?

Thanks,

Parents

Main over 16 years ago

Hey StephenH, Are sure the syntax you suggested is legal? I tried that already before and the Compiler was expecting ':' meaning [a:b] and not a list.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Reply

Main over 16 years ago

Hey StephenH, Are sure the syntax you suggested is legal? I tried that already before and the Compiler was expecting ':' meaning [a:b] and not a list.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Children

No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.