• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Functional Verification
  3. Gate Level simulation for Big(Huge) chip

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2
  • Subscribers 65
  • Views 1654
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Gate Level simulation for Big(Huge) chip

Brodov Dmitriy
Brodov Dmitriy over 16 years ago

Hello!

I have the target of running the Gate Level (GTL) simulation for large chip.
The GTL simulation is very, very slow and impossible to debug in such conditions.

Is any one familiar with the solution to fast up the simulation:
It could be tools or some sort of hierarchy design/SDF, Netlist splitting and etc?

Thank you for the help ;-)

BR, Dima

 

  • Cancel
  • StephenH
    StephenH over 16 years ago

    Hi Dima.

    The laziest way to speed up netlist simulations is to use a hardware emulator like Palladium - it can run at MHz speeds with full debuggability, work with non-synthesisable testbenches and connect to the real world too. Emulation is a lot cheaper now than it was even just a few years ago, so it might be worth investigation.

    For NCSim simulation, you might try turning off any cell library timing checks (ncelab -notimingchecks).
    You should consider turning off as much of the simulation access as possible (no -access +RWC), or turn it on only for the blocks you might need to traces waves for.

    Splitting the netlist might be an option, certainly some people are doing that.
    Since you can elaborate multiple snapshots into a single INCA_libs library, you can elaborate a few different chip views, name each snapshot according to its purpose, then use "ncsim <snapshot_name>" to simulate the chosen design subset.

    Maybe some other readers have some other suggestions that work for them?

    Regards,
    Steve.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Brodov Dmitriy
    Brodov Dmitriy over 16 years ago

    Steve, Thank you very much for your answer.


    Palladium sound interesting, but expensive ;-)
    Turning off all the timing checks is not such a good options since "timing checks" is one of issues that are not fully covered by STA.
    Right now i am checking the splitting of Netlist/SDF files and how the verification env. will handle it.


    If I will reach some new conclusion I will post them.

     

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information