• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Functional Verification
  3. Controlling Seed to multi langauge verification environ...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 5
  • Subscribers 64
  • Views 14637
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Controlling Seed to multi langauge verification environment

jaichandra
jaichandra over 10 years ago

Hi

   I working on a multi language environment (UVM + C++)for an IP verification. I am new to C++. We are using a C++ model in our verification environment. We are precompiling the C++ model and call the C++ model through A DPI function. srand() function is called to generate random value in C++ file. We can control seed to UVM with -seed or -svseed irun command line option. Does C++ also use seed to generate its variables. If it does how can we control seed from irun command line?

 - regards

  • Cancel
Parents
  • StephenH
    StephenH over 10 years ago

    As far as I'm aware, srand() would not be modified / re-implemented by the simulator so you'll be getting the default seed (1) unless you explicitly seed srand() itself, as per "man srand". Note the caveats in the man page regarding the lack of thread safety and hence stability of the sequence generated.

    You should really consider generating all your random numbers in SV, certainly if you want any kind of constraint on the sequence you really do not want to be doing this in C++!

    If you have random generation in SV and in C++, it will be hard for you to ensure the random sequence is stable and repeatable for debugging, whereas in SV and UVM this would be taken care of for you.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • StephenH
    StephenH over 10 years ago

    As far as I'm aware, srand() would not be modified / re-implemented by the simulator so you'll be getting the default seed (1) unless you explicitly seed srand() itself, as per "man srand". Note the caveats in the man page regarding the lack of thread safety and hence stability of the sequence generated.

    You should really consider generating all your random numbers in SV, certainly if you want any kind of constraint on the sequence you really do not want to be doing this in C++!

    If you have random generation in SV and in C++, it will be hard for you to ensure the random sequence is stable and repeatable for debugging, whereas in SV and UVM this would be taken care of for you.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information