• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Logic Design
  3. RTL compiler: how to do bottom-up synthesis

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4
  • Subscribers 63
  • Views 15912
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

RTL compiler: how to do bottom-up synthesis

airland
airland over 14 years ago

I used Design Compiler before and do synthesis bottom-up. Now I changed to use RTL compiler to do synthesis. I have read the user manual but I did not found how to do bottom-up synthesis using RTL compiler. Could any one tell me or show me a simple synthesis script for bottom-up synthesis?

Thanks.

  • Cancel
  • croy
    croy over 14 years ago

    Hi

     

    Do you have to stick to bottom-up? From what I understand DC users do bottom-up because of capacity limitations. You should find the capacity to be higher in RC, probably allowing you to switch to top-down.

     

    Chrystian

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • airland
    airland over 14 years ago
    Yes, as our design is complex and clock is fast. Bottom-up may have better result

    I want to how to do bottom-up synthesis using RC.

    Could you please give some suggestions?

    Thanks very much!

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • grasshopper
    grasshopper over 14 years ago

    Hi airland,

    not sure what you are after. Synthesis tools do not know what you are gonig to do with the netlist so you can always use a synthesized netlist at the next level up. What are the specific of your bottom-up question ? For fast designs I would argue that Top-down traditionally yields better results. The benefits of top-down are various:

    - single scripts environment to maintain

    - no need to budget/guesstimate I/O delays

    - better optimization of constant driven paths

    This is not to say there are no benefits to running bottom up but the motivation you mention is better suited for top-down than bottom-up IMHO. In anycase, as per your original question, please clarify what aspects you are looking for and we can try to better help you

     regards,

    gh-

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • airland
    airland over 14 years ago

    Thanks for your kindly reply. I know top-down is better. I just want to know how to do bottom-up synthesis.

    My question is as following:

    read the whole design for one time and then use like DC's set current_design, set_dont_touch, etc. to synthesis each submodules and then synthesis the top module. For this usage we only need invoke RC license for one time; if we read one submodule, and use RC to synthesis; then read another submodule to synthesis, etc. This will invoke RC license for many times. If the license is not enough, it may be not suitable.

     So I want to know whether RC support this usage (like DC to read the whole large design for one time and then synthesis each submodules/top modules with bottom-up method) or not.

    Thanks.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information