• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Allegro X Capture CIS
  3. What areas of OrCAD Capture would users like to see improved...

Stats

  • Replies 20
  • Subscribers 47
  • Views 13310
  • Members are here 0
More Content

What areas of OrCAD Capture would users like to see improved?

dfernseb
dfernseb over 2 years ago

OrCAD Capture is a powerful schematic capture solution used by many commercial and educational institutions. Its longevity and functional flexibility has made it a staple to PCB, Packaging, and FPGA design flows. As we continue to enhance the core product based on our strategic initiatives I'd like to get feedback from the users of where you feel we could provide the most value to accelerate your productivity. Is it in technology areas like library development, data management, simulation, etc... or in modernization of presentation, usability, and ecosystem?

I look forward to the dialog! Slight smile

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel
Parents
  • RFinley
    RFinley over 2 years ago

    I believe there's a timesaver/DRC function that could leverage the UI behind Variant View.   

    One thing that corrupts netlists:  adding more than one net alias on a net and engineering misses the conflict.  

    How about a view that highlights duplicate/conflicting net aliases and duplicate designators?  

     

    Love the find dialog panel introduced with 17.4.

    It's easy to show the session log.  Frustrating to see the dialog for find results.  Have to resize the DRC results dialog height to get find to show up.

     

    Another goof is editing a sub-block of a hierarchical project and forgetting to do a synch-up.   

    Warning message the next time a project is opened?   Out of date hierarchy?

    Third goof is engineers keep losing work when the Save button doesn't do a full save.  Page is open.  I have to tell engineers to quit out of Capture, then do a SVN commit to be sure everything is written to disk.

    We noticed an issue with CIS Update part properties.   We show the Temp Coefficient property to avoid mistakes.  But, not all CIS parts in the database use that property.   CIS Update Parts repeatedly can't accept a null field between the schematic instance and CIS data.  Do we click to update all?   That is the question.

    I found an issue with ::capDesignUtil::replaceAlias that acts the same from 16.6 to 17.4.   If multiple alias search string lengths don't match, replacement happens randomly, like it's triggering the replacement even though the string lengths don't match.  I found this out for a utility I shared: 

    https://community.cadence.com/cadence_technology_forums/pcb-design/f/pcb-editor-skill/51803/skill-method-to-optimize-netlist-pin-assignments-during-routing-using-allegro-orcad

    The TEMP- aliases intended to be replaced by real aliases must be of the same string length or random things happen when running the Tcl script.

    Thanks! 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
Reply
  • RFinley
    RFinley over 2 years ago

    I believe there's a timesaver/DRC function that could leverage the UI behind Variant View.   

    One thing that corrupts netlists:  adding more than one net alias on a net and engineering misses the conflict.  

    How about a view that highlights duplicate/conflicting net aliases and duplicate designators?  

     

    Love the find dialog panel introduced with 17.4.

    It's easy to show the session log.  Frustrating to see the dialog for find results.  Have to resize the DRC results dialog height to get find to show up.

     

    Another goof is editing a sub-block of a hierarchical project and forgetting to do a synch-up.   

    Warning message the next time a project is opened?   Out of date hierarchy?

    Third goof is engineers keep losing work when the Save button doesn't do a full save.  Page is open.  I have to tell engineers to quit out of Capture, then do a SVN commit to be sure everything is written to disk.

    We noticed an issue with CIS Update part properties.   We show the Temp Coefficient property to avoid mistakes.  But, not all CIS parts in the database use that property.   CIS Update Parts repeatedly can't accept a null field between the schematic instance and CIS data.  Do we click to update all?   That is the question.

    I found an issue with ::capDesignUtil::replaceAlias that acts the same from 16.6 to 17.4.   If multiple alias search string lengths don't match, replacement happens randomly, like it's triggering the replacement even though the string lengths don't match.  I found this out for a utility I shared: 

    https://community.cadence.com/cadence_technology_forums/pcb-design/f/pcb-editor-skill/51803/skill-method-to-optimize-netlist-pin-assignments-during-routing-using-allegro-orcad

    The TEMP- aliases intended to be replaced by real aliases must be of the same string length or random things happen when running the Tcl script.

    Thanks! 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
Children
No Data
Cadence Guidelines

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information