• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Buses in spectreText when creating symbol

Stats

  • Replies 1
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 93
  • Members are here 0

Buses in spectreText when creating symbol

MC20250412421
MC20250412421 3 days ago

Hello everyone,

This is a repeat of this question but since no one answered I thought I could ask it again.
If there are multiple pins A_0, A_1, A_2 in a spectreText view, can you merge them so that the symbol generated from this view shows a unique pin A<2:0> ?

This is basically having something analogous to the schematic view where it is possible to create bus pins like A<2:0> and the symbol would automatically include such pins.

Thanks in advance for your responses and have a great day !

  • Cancel
  • Sign in to reply
Parents
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett 2 days ago

    If you can change the subckt names to be as follows (note the escaped angle-brackets):

    subckt textbus op bus\<3\> bus\<2\> bus\<1\> bus\<0\>
    r1 (bus\<3\> op) resistor r=1k
    r2 (bus\<2\> op) resistor r=1k
    r3 (bus\<1\> op) resistor r=1k
    r4 (bus\<0\> op) resistor r=1k

    ends textbus

    Then you will be offered to create a symbol with these names:

    op bus<3> bus<2> bus<1> bus<0>

    It's then easy to change to:

    op bus<3:0>

    but what will happen is that the terminal order will be recorded so that it knows the order they appear in in the subckt and so the netlist will be done correctly. For this to work, it really needs the names to be an expanded bus name syntax, whereas A_0, A_1 etc doesn't express any meaningful bus mapping from the A<3:0> to individual bits.

    That's probably the best approach. The challenge is that Spectre (like SPICE) does not have a bus syntax itself - so you need to ensure the names match what ADE would have netlisted them as.

    Andrew

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett 2 days ago

    If you can change the subckt names to be as follows (note the escaped angle-brackets):

    subckt textbus op bus\<3\> bus\<2\> bus\<1\> bus\<0\>
    r1 (bus\<3\> op) resistor r=1k
    r2 (bus\<2\> op) resistor r=1k
    r3 (bus\<1\> op) resistor r=1k
    r4 (bus\<0\> op) resistor r=1k

    ends textbus

    Then you will be offered to create a symbol with these names:

    op bus<3> bus<2> bus<1> bus<0>

    It's then easy to change to:

    op bus<3:0>

    but what will happen is that the terminal order will be recorded so that it knows the order they appear in in the subckt and so the netlist will be done correctly. For this to work, it really needs the names to be an expanded bus name syntax, whereas A_0, A_1 etc doesn't express any meaningful bus mapping from the A<3:0> to individual bits.

    That's probably the best approach. The challenge is that Spectre (like SPICE) does not have a bus syntax itself - so you need to ensure the names match what ADE would have netlisted them as.

    Andrew

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information