• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Logic Design
  3. Multi corner workaround with RC?

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 5
  • Subscribers 61
  • Views 15949
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Multi corner workaround with RC?

archive
archive over 18 years ago

Hi,

I need advice related to WC and WCL corners.  Thanks.

At very small geometry, a std cell delay can be slower with decreasing temperature.  As a result, we have a new corner named WCL. It is the same as WC except that temperature is at -40 degree and not 125 degree. Compare between WC and WCL, a std cell is not always slower or faster at one corner.  As delays are modelled as 7x7 table for rise/fall/rise_transition/fall_tranisiton, a cell can be faster/slower in some of the entries at WC or WCL.

My question is how do I get the best possible result in term of timing, leakage, dynamic power and area with RC.  The easy answer is to use multi-corner approach that is available in SoC. But multi-corner is not available in RC and I think runtime will increase.

Any workaround you can recommend ?

Regards,
Eng Han


Originally posted in cdnusers.org by EngHan
  • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 18 years ago

    Hi EngHan,

    I had a similar issue and used the power_library attribute to address this. The attribute allows you to specify a different corner library for the power analysis. This can be specially important when using multiVT libraries since some libraries show very little difference in leakage in such low temperatures.

    good luck,
    gh-


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by grasshopper
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 18 years ago

    Hi GH,

    Can you elaborate more? I cannot understand how you get around it.

    To explain my issue more, the main concern is timing opt. I cannot optimise at WC alone or WCL alone, as both are the the worst-case. There is a suggestion to merge these 2 corners into a "merged dotlib", but I think this approach will work for timing but will mess up area and power QOR.

    Regards,
    Eng Han


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by EngHan
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 18 years ago

    Hi EngHan,

    power should certainly not suffer. The power_library attribute should certainly guarantee that. It basically tells RC to use a different library to evaluate power. I also saw in the low power document that there is support for DVFS hence you could address your multi-mode issues that way. Seems that would be much cleaner than a merged dotlib. If you try that, I would be curious to hear how it goes. I suspect there is a runtime penalty but other than that, I think this would be quite powerful.

    good luck,
    gh-


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by grasshopper
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 18 years ago

    Hi GH,

    I think you misunderstood my problem. It has nothing to do with DVFS. I am not using DVFS, nor multi-voltage.

    I try to simplify my problem here again with a few lines. I hope it will be clearer to everyone.

    In 65nm and below, we have a new corner : WCL. Sometime a delay/transition in WCL is worst, sometime WC is worst. So I cannot synthesis with WC nor WCL as both are not the worst case. What should I use during RC synthesis?

    Regards,
    Eng Han


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by EngHan
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 18 years ago

    Hi EngHan,

    I realize you do not have a DVFS design. If you look carefully you will see that you can use the DVFS methodology in RC to address your issue. While it was probably meant to use libraries that are characterized to different voltages, there is nothing that prevents you from using it for libraries characterized to different whatever and get a concurrent that hits the toughest corner of every path. Sometimes the trick is to get creative with unintended uses of available technology.

    good luck,
    gh-


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by grasshopper
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information