• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Digital Implementation
  3. power routing for pads

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 6
  • Subscribers 91
  • Views 17400
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

power routing for pads

gops
gops over 16 years ago
I intend to use0.18um TSMC library .When i choose the IO library i came to see that each IO cell need two VDD supply voltages one VDD(1.8V) and another VDDPST(3.3V). Also i found the VDDPAD and VSSPAD are provided for both core and IOs. I dont understand why we need VDD pad for IOs. Can anybody please tell me the reason in detail. Also please tell me reagrding power routing for IO cells.
  • Cancel
  • Kari
    Kari over 16 years ago

     I'm not sure I completely understand, and I'm not familiar with that particular library, but in general, there is a core VDD and an IO VDD. The core VDD I'm sure you're familiar with, and core-VDD IO cells feed the core grid. The power source coming into the chip connects to the pads of these IOs. The IO VDD is usually a ring that is connected by the IO cells abutting each other. These need a source from off-chip as well, which would be the pads of the io-VDD IO cells.

    Hope that makes sense,

     - Kari

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • gops
    gops over 16 years ago
    Hi Kari;
    Thanks for the reply. I understood what you said.I'm sorry about my question being not clear.
    I mean to say:
     
    We use IO cells to connect the external inputs,clock ,power to the core of the chip. So we need to place the IO cells for all these pins of the chip. Usually these IO cells will be connected to the IO PADs and ESD diodes.But I have also seen pads for the IO power supply.I need to know whether I should include these cells also along with the IO cells.
     
    See the following eg:
     
    X : input;
    Y: output;
    clk:clock.
    VSS: core vdd.
    VSS:core vss.
     
    If this is the case for a design, according to my knowlede I need to put pads only for these five inputs. I need to know whather i should put pads for the IO vdd along with these IO cells.Hope the question is now clear.
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Kari
    Kari over 16 years ago

     Hi Gops,

     I'm still not sure I understand - but it sounds like your IO structures consist of several pieces - is that correct? The PAD piece, the ESD piece, etc. I'm not used to these kinds of IOs. The IO cells I have worked with are all in one piece, and we just place them. There are signal IOs, clk IOs, core VDD/VSS IOs, and IO VDD/VSS IOs. These are placed around the periphery of the chip. We usually have some discretion in how many core VDD/VSS and IO VDD/VSS IOs are included, you just have to make sure there are enough to power the chip.

    I feel like I'm not helping with your question though. Sorry! :-)

    - Kari 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • gops
    gops over 16 years ago
    Hi Kari;
     
    What you told is right.My IO structure consists of several pieces.
     
    Any way can you please give me some details of how to route the IO ring for the following cases.
     
    a) Both core and IO at same voltage.
    b) Core and IO at different voltage.
     
    I think the VDD/VSS IO is rquired only for the second one. Can you please tell me the steps i need to follow for routing the IO ring in above two cases.
     
    Please tell me how to use a power cut cell in the design also.
     
    Thanks n regards
    gops
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Kari
    Kari over 16 years ago

     Hi Gops,

    I don't think I've ever seen a design where core and IO power were the same voltage. However, I don't think it would matter. You would still have a core pwr/gnd ring that you add, and the IO pwr/gnd ring is connected by abutment of the IO cells. If there are gaps between IO cells, you put in IO fillers so that the rails are continuous. The corner cell is the same idea - it continues the rails around the corner.

    You would need "power cut" cells, or break cells, anywhere in the IO ring that you did not want the IO pwr/gnd to be continuous. For example, maybe most of your chip is digital but you have a small analog section, which includes analog IOs. They may be at a different voltage, or the same voltage but from a different vendor and so the pwr/gnd busses don't line up with your digital IOs. You would want to put break cells/endcap cells here to properly terminate the IO pwr/gnd rails. There can be break cells that just "cut" the busses in the middle, but could continue on either side, and there can also be endcap cells that just terminate the rails. It really depends on your design requirements where and when these are needed, as well as what is available in the IO library.

    - Kari 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • joshy
    joshy over 16 years ago

    Enthaaa gops, ninte doubt??? 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information