• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Functional Verification
CDNS - double leaderboard script

Functional Verification

  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

Latest Posts

  • Create a new Post
  • Discussion

    Differences b/w logic , reg & wire

    Category: Functional Verification

    By archive archive

    •

    updated over 18 years ago by archive

    7 replies • 5295 views
  • Discussion

    Does OVM methodology supports Module based SV

    Category: Functional Verification

    By archive archive

    •

    updated over 18 years ago by archive

    4 replies • 13717 views
  • Discussion

    for/generate

    Category: Functional Verification

    By archive archive

    •

    updated over 18 years ago by archive

    9 replies • 3448 views
  • Discussion

    regarding URM development

    Category: Functional Verification

    By archive archive

    •

    updated over 18 years ago by archive

    2 replies • 13322 views
  • Discussion

    Controlling generation

    Category: Functional Verification

    By archive archive

    •

    updated over 18 years ago by archive

    3 replies • 13525 views
  • Discussion

    Constraining Dynamic array size

    Category: Functional Verification

    By archive archive

    •

    updated over 18 years ago by archive

    3 replies • 17920 views
  • Discussion

    PSL Fairness Assertions

    Category: Functional Verification

    By archive archive

    •

    updated over 18 years ago by archive

    2 replies • 13857 views
  • Discussion

    What do you think of the new OVM announcement?

    Category: Functional Verification

    By archive archive

    •

    updated over 18 years ago by archive

    5 replies • 14196 views
  • Discussion

    TB Simplification

    Category: Functional Verification

    By archive archive

    •

    updated over 18 years ago by archive

    5 replies • 13802 views
  • Discussion

    Methodology for attaching Monitors to existing DUT

    Category: Functional Verification

    By archive archive

    •

    started over 18 years ago

    0 replies • 12871 views
  • Discussion

    unsynthesisable keyword - typedef enum ?

    Category: Functional Verification

    By archive archive

    •

    updated over 18 years ago by archive

    7 replies • 4210 views
  • Discussion

    Tracking Customized Metrics

    Category: Functional Verification

    By archive archive

    •

    started over 18 years ago

    0 replies • 12706 views
  • Discussion

    howto? triggering event off 1 bit of uint simple_port

    Category: Functional Verification

    By archive archive

    •

    updated over 18 years ago by archive

    2 replies • 13230 views
  • Discussion

    When will IUS support union?

    Category: Functional Verification

    By archive archive

    •

    updated over 18 years ago by archive

    1 replies • 13022 views
  • Discussion

    CDNusers networking luncheon at CDNLive! 2007 SV

    Category: Functional Verification

    By archive archive

    •

    started over 18 years ago

    0 replies • 12507 views
<>

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information