• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Digital Implementation
  3. long wire transition time issues

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 14
  • Subscribers 90
  • Views 18325
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

long wire transition time issues

archive
archive over 17 years ago

In my current design,some wires are quite long,look like over 3000ums,diriven by a buffer,fe does not report the net has transition violation.it should be a problem for the wires are so long.these pins/path are not constrained,could encounter fix this kind thing?if so,what should i do?


Originally posted in cdnusers.org by yhu
  • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 17 years ago

    set_max_transition in sdc may solve this. If the transition on this net violates the max limit set, Ecounter sees this as violaton and may fix it during DRV Fix
    Not sure :)


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by Devi
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 17 years ago

    i am sure this is well set,and encounter does fix all the violations which are reported.i think take charge of the path constrained,but it should also handle the path which not constrained,especially for the transition time.3000+um should be a problem.or can anyone provide a way to fix these long wires?


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by yhu
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 17 years ago

    You may face such problem if there is no timing path through this net.
    No timing path can come from a false_path, disable_timing_arc or constant propagation from SDC or tie connection coming from the netlist.
    The transition is calculate by the timer, and the consequence is that is there is no path, there is no transition, so no fix on your long wire.
    The trick you can use is to defined a default SDC, where you only put the set_load, set_input_transition ... constrains.
    Load only this new SDC and run optDesign -drv.
    Now the tools should be able to catsh your long net....

    Pat.


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by bougantp
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 17 years ago

    i checked the sdc, there is no set_load/set_input_transition for the input,and the report_timing -through [net_name] reports the input transition is 0.00. I think a 2000um(space 0.2um,width 0.2um) input net should be a transition violation based .13um process.
    by the way,the set_max_transition is 1.4ns.


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by yhu
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 17 years ago

    Make a copy of your constraint file where all the set_case_analysis statements are commented out. Then do a reportTranViolation with that constraint file loaded. You can use report_cell_instance_timing to check a specific pin you are worried about.

    - Kari


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by Kari
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 17 years ago

    You can try with the following variables: which will not consider set_false_path,set_desable_timing,set_case_analysis , exceptions for transition reporting and fixing , It basically propagates transition through constants .

    setvar dbgPropSlewForUnconstrainedPath 1

    Let me know if this could solve your current Issue??

    Cheers.
    -Mohan




    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by mohanch007
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 17 years ago

    Kari,

    reportTansViolation could not report transition violation,but report_cell_instance_timing did report transition violations.

    if use timeDesign -postRoute, no tran vio,then use report_cell_instance_timing,no tran vio,neither.
    if only use report_cell_instance_timing,FE could report tran vios ( i mean spefIn ,then report_cell_instance_timing without any timeDesign or reportTransViolation)

    you know,if there are transition violations,report_cell_instance_timing could report it,but timeDesign could not report it,so how could i fix it?


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by yhu
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 17 years ago

    Mohan

    it could report transition violations,for one or two,i could fix it manually,but for hundreds of (not that many),how could i fix it?

    also,if i spefIn,then timeDesign then reportTranViolation,FE could not report the vios.

    so the step worked is spefIn then reportTranViolation


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by yhu
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 17 years ago

    Hi , Thought the Issues was regarding fixing transition on constant nets , But your Issue was some thing different.
    To address your Issue I need to know the back ground of your environment : like
    What you do is : (and let us know the values too) :
    1. you setAnalysis mode , ( was it set to -setup mode ??)
    2. setExtract mode ( was it -signoff??)
    and also do the below at your end and le me know the results .
    Step-1 : spefIn
    Step-2: selectNet < net with 0ver 3000ums >
    Step-3: reportSelect

    make a note of resistance and cap value on it.

    After doing timeDesign select the same net and do the above Step-1&2 ,

    the whole intention is to know if some thing wrong at yhu end. in doing .

    Once you confirm I will let you know the fixing procedure !! , the mail thing is we need to make to understand that there is a transition violation , if its real .

    cheers,
    -Mohan


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by mohanch007
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 17 years ago

    Mohan

    As you said, AnalysisMode is set to -checkType setup,and ExtractRCMode -engine signOff

    spefIn and selectNseet and reportSelect before and after timeDesign,R is the same.

    if i set ExtractRCMode -engine detail,and there is a transition violation.

    One thing i need to clarify is that for the current design,no "set_drive_cell" and "set_input_transition" and any constrains like this for the input pins.so what is the default? you know ,set_input_transition 0.6 is ok, but set 0.8 will cause transition violations.

    my think is for such a long wire,directly from input,there should be a problem,so how could encounter handle it?


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by yhu
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
>

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information